Participation place

Home

Shortcuts:
> Help us translate
> Design new skins
> Send us feedback
> Suggest features
> Vote for features
> Netcipia's Tutorial
> Widget List
> Best Practices
> Known Issues

You must be invited to be able to edit this pages. Please contact us for this.

GoogleSearch

Toolbox

     - Page -
PDF
Print
     - Space -
Index
     - Place -
What's new
     - Support -
Contact
FAQ
Features
Feedback
Participate
Tutorial
Wiki Syntax

RSS Feeds
Subscribe RSS feeds Click & copy/paste URL

Information area

AdSense


I'm also a teacher of last year graduate students in marketing and commerce on internet courses. One of my classes is "New Technologies and enterprise organization". For a long time, I'm using this kind of tools (collaborative workspaces, wikis, etc.) to put the students in real usage position, and giving them only theorerical lessons.

The firts thing I did this year is to create a netcipia place for the class, invite all the students, and tell them now to manage themselves the organization of the place. They have the obligation to invite other teachers, administrative staff, and to organize the place to be:

  • a repository of all the documents given by the teachers during the year
  • a place of discussion outside the university between them and the teachers, and between the students themselves

I divided the class in different groups, each group is responsible of a special topic, each group has its own home page in the place, where he can write its own documents, create new pages, follow the actions, etc.

We created in fact a virtual classroom, an extension of the real classroom. The augmented classroom :-)

Miguel

PS: Don't hesitate to comment and discuss this story with me ;-)




Comments

coincommentDominique Hébert    Dec 11, 2006 10:49 PST
xwiki:XWiki.ddr882350463 coincomment
I use the same concept with my students and it's a very good tool to experiment cooperation and collaboration.
coincommentCristiano Nattero    Feb 26, 2007 19:07 PST
xwiki:XWiki.cgm31965670 coincomment
Sounds good, I'll soon experiment with some classes. They're very young (12-14 YO), I'll write some feedback.
coincommentRichard Leslie    Mar 16, 2008 13:00 PST
xwiki:XWiki.rmu402429468 coincomment
I'll be piloting this with my college Theatre Appreciation class this Spring. I'm using this as a shared group project space where they can create a report page on a particular period of theatre history.
coincommentErnest Perez    Dec 13, 2008 16:11 PST
xwiki:XWiki.egm1684166818 coincomment
I used wikis, Blackboard, videoconferencing, etc., for several years, teaching in a graduate library school program. Among other exercises:

OUTSIDE READING:

  • Each student responsible for selecting & reporting to class on 3 outside readings which they find for themselves. (Additional to assigned reading)
  • Assignment to post a _short_ report on the reading, major points, student evaluation of the author's success in communicating worthwhile point(s), etc. Report not to be longer than 1 word.doc normal page of comment.
  • Each student assigned to make comments or communication about 3 of his peer's review/reports.

TOPICAL REPORTS:

  • Each student (or team) assigned one instructor-defined topical report during the semester. Reports parallel and add to the curricular material.
  • Each report is 2-3 pages in length; to be accompanied by one-page bibliography of student's recommended resources for info on the topic.
  • Students to comment on and discuss each other's topical reports.

No assigned # of comments.

TERM PROJECT:

  • Students assigned dates of "presentations" of their term projects to the class.
  • Content = paper & biblio, results, demo of project if applicable.
  • Q&A via email posts on each term project - detail, questions about approach, methods, lessons learned, etc.

The comments on each other's short outside readings reports brought out a lot of discussion, like in a live classroom. They got used to the method with the assigned # of reports, and the assigned discussion comments. There were no assigned number of comments on the other two assignment discussions. But now they were HOOKED on the practice. Result: There were 15 or 20 posts per day. LOTS of information exchange, application to real life, etc.

A couple of instructor advisory notes about discussion the content, not much, really.

  • No "Me, too" kinds of messages - instead add to the discussion, bring up points, etc.
  • Bring up meaningful or useful points.
  • I informed them in syllabus that part of the grade was to be based on "contribution to class discussion." Again, that prompted the participation, until no prompting was needed...just the fun of exchanging ideas and information.

Unplanned result - I spent hours and hours reading everyone's email. Lots of them included questions to me about the topic of the discussion. Whew!

Add Comment...
Enter your name
Type the characters you see in the picture below
refresh
legal terms | privacy policy | contact | © 2006-2008 Netcipia® Inc. - All rights reserved